Case Summary 🔎
Diagnosis
#46 Peri-implantitis caused inflammation and bone loss around an implant.
Treatment Plan
Peri-implantitis at #46 was addressed using the i-brush II for debridement and disinfection.
Results
i-brush II was used to remove inflammation around the implant and to treat the implant surface, resulting in the formation of a machined surface for improved biocompatibility and healing.
Before & After
Products Used
The i-Brush II by Neobiotech was utilized for peri-implantitis treatment, providing effective cleaning and transformation of the contaminated implant surface into a new machined surface. Its design and functionality make it an excellent tool for implant care.
Effective Cleaning: Titanium bristles ensure thorough debridement of implant threads.
Flexible Design: A flexible stem allows easy access to narrow cavities and hard-to-reach areas.
Surface Transformation: Creates a new machined surface by mechanically debriding the contaminated implant.
Precision Tip: Titanium alloy tip is designed to reach thread pockets and decontaminate inter-thread spaces.
Recommended Speed: Operates best at 2,000–10,000 rpm.
Case Presentation
1️⃣ Pre-Op
The panoramic image revealed peri-implantitis at #46, characterized by inflammation and bone loss around the implant, which was diagnosed and treated using an i-brush II.
2️⃣ Surgery - Peri-Implantitis Treatment
fig 1. #46 Peri-implantitis caused inflammation and bone loss around an implant.
fig 2, 3. Removed inflammation around #46 implant using i-brush II.
mov 1. Each site requires at least 1 minute of i-Brush II rotation to achieve a clean, machined surface. (1:1 contra-angle low-speed handpiece 5,000-10,000 RPM)
fig 4. The transformation into a machined surface was confirmed by its shiny appearance.
fig 5. The machined surface was treated with minocycline around the fixture and rinsed thoroughly with saline.
fig 6. The peri-implantitis-treated site typically has limited expectations for successful grafting; however, Neo Bone (alloplast, 100% cortical) was grafted to support potential bone formation.
fig 7. A layer of synthetic bone (DM Bone - HA 6: B-TCP 4) was applied on top.
fig 8. Subsequently, the area was covered with a Collaguide membrane to protect the graft
fig 9. The completed appearance after suturing.
3️⃣ Post-Op
Before & After: Periapical X-rays
Before & After: Panoramic X-rays
5 month follow-up